You Are Here: Home » Tech Gadgets » Is Photography Still An Expensive Hobby?

Is Photography Still An Expensive Hobby?

Back before the digital camera era really took off, photography could become very expensive unless all you wanted to do was take some basic family photos. In the early stages of film photography, a darkroom with all kinds of machines was a requirement and it still was until its end in order to achieve exactly what you wanted with each picture. Eventually digital cameras started getting inexpensive, and the ability to take outstanding pictures that you could then work with on a computer became more and more possible. Eventually phones got cameras, and then we got to the point where professional photographers were using some of these phones for their creative works, especially the iPhone 4S.

Each and every hobby has its own set entry price, in a way. Meaning that all hobbies pretty much have a minimum cost just to get started, but you can make the hobby as expensive as you want it to be. However, a big part of photography is the user. You could have a $8000 DSLR with an army of telephoto, wide-angle, and 1:1 lenses and have lousy pictures if you don’t know what you’re working with.

Photography overall has certainly gotten cheaper. Because it’s all digital unless you still want to put up the money to play around with film photography, you can easily take as many pictures as you want. With digital photography, we have the luxury of not having to worry if a picture doesn’t turn out exactly how we want it. We can just delete and start over. Also, any manipulation or editing you want to do with that picture is now done on the computer. After you get done shooting you can simply load the images on to the computer and begin your work. Editing software may seem expensive to some, but it’s a lot cheaper and less time-consuming than a darkroom, and there’s a lot more you can do with it. If you still want the pictures printed, there are online service that will do it as well as many stores. Or, you can purchase your own photo printer.

I’ve seen a lot of people (including myself) take some fantastic photos with an inexpensive point and shoot digital cameras. Some would argue that you aren’t a true photographer if you use one of these, but what about the pros using their iPhones? As I’ve said before, photography isn’t all about your gear. There are a lot of rules that go along with getting a lot of good pictures. A big thing is composition and the rule of thirds. Don’t always put the focus of your image in the center. Most digital cameras take in extremely high-resolution, so you can always crop if you need to. A digital SLR does offer some features I like such as manual focus, but it’s all about your personal preference. So no, for a lot of amateurs like me, photography isn’t an expensive hobby. And hey, if you post your photos on sites like Flickr or a personal blog and get people to notice them. You might turn into a pro.


About The Author

Paul Shirey is the founder of Paul Shirey Tech. Paul loves exploring and learning about the latest tech stories. When he isn't reporting the latest tech news and stories to you you will find him playing Minecraft and blowing himself up as much as possible.

Number of Entries : 298
  • http://www.stichtingmilieunet.nl/andersbekekenblog Milieunet

    No, photography is easy these days with a camera on almost every mobile telephone

  • catherinewhite

    As a hobby it’s very accessible, however beyond that, we are talking serious dollars.

  • Ryan Zeigler

    I have ~$600 invested in my gear and 20% of that is the cost of my bag. Photography is for photographers – getting the shot is what counts.

  • http://bruceandsallywitt.wordpress.com/ Sally K Witt

    I am having so much fun with taking photos with my digital camera and the ipad with instagram.  I do it for the enjoyment, and it is very healing to take pretty pictures and enjoy the world!

  • http://twitter.com/msdcarey Daria

    Only the camera is expensive since processing is now free 

    • uDaeth

      What about editing software?

  • http://twitter.com/srivatsan316 Srivatsan

    Hobby – affordable … Start talking of passion, profession – takes a lot to invest. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/lucas.wyrsch Lucas Wyrsch

    Even the camera, if used from a mobile technology, can now be at almost no cost and as Daria mentioned, processing is now free also. 

    • uDaeth

      You need photo editing software

  • http://twitter.com/Annehthomas AnneThomas

    I’m totally an amateur, but i’m finding improvement after taking many pictures.

  • http://twitter.com/tpr2 tpr2

    Paul I have a professional DSLR with some very expensive L series lenses, however most of my photography ends up being done on my phone due to that being the only camera present.

    Like any hobby you can make this as expensive or as inexpensive as you like, the last lens I bought for example cost me $2500 yet heaps of my photos get taken on a $500 canon due to convenience.I also have photoshop which is not cheap here in NZ but is a handy tool for photographers.If you consider my phone takes twice as many photos as the canon because it is always with me, you could say photography as a hobby is cheap as chips or if you looked at my 5d the 3 L series lenses and photoshop and you would say it was expensive. :-)

  • http://drupal.txwikinger.me.uk/ Ralph Janke

    Long time ago I took lots of really good wildlife pictures with a Yashica with tele zoom 80-200. Now I am really confused. Not sure what DSLR camera I should get.

    • uDaeth

      I’ve heard a lot of good things about the T3i

  • http://socialpositive.wordpress.com/ Nick

    Even with simple digit camera, I still have choice to make photo better – like control speed. However, it takes me a long time to learn how to control those parameters. My skills grow with time spend on the hobby. 

  • http://twitter.com/libdrone outofit

    imho,  it’s really all about skill.   As you point out even professional photographers are using their phones to shoot great pics.   And the fact remains that folks like me who really have no talent for taking pictures would not benefit from even the most expensive equipment.

  • http://www.facebook.com/emily.pattersonkane Emily Patterson-Kane

    I don;t seem to have trouble shooting stock with a $200 camera. I wonder how much professional “need” an expensive DSLR, and how much they just “want” one?

  • http://twitter.com/confluencemedia Elza van Swieten

    It is not all about the amount of pixels too. I haven’t seen a smartphone with which you can play with the 
    depth of field. It requires a 
    SLR camera. 

    • uDaeth

      I can do depth with my camera and software fleet

  • http://twitter.com/avtariuz Leon De Silva

    As a hobbyist, how you use what you have matters the most. If you plan to make a living, what you use also matters.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Gaye-Crispin/100001209325985 Gaye Crispin

    Hi Paul,

    I love taking on-the-spot instant snap shots of the unexpected so I invested a fair bit of money in a cool camera. To date I’ve snapped more that I’m happy with from my iPhone than from my fine and dandy camera which is too cumbersome to cart around on a daily basis. In hindsight I think I would have benefited more by investing in decent photo editing software instead… as you mentioned to another poster. 

    Have a great week-end,

    Gaye 

    • uDaeth

      I need to carry around my camera with me more, wish I had a smartphone

  • http://twitter.com/azmushko Alex Zmushka

    I am with the most of comments. Most of the time my phone is the only camera I have handy.. :)

  • http://twitter.com/JayMassey Jay Massey

    I’m an old-skool B&W photographer and developer. Now it is my Android and now a Canon SX201S.

    • uDaeth

      Black and white is still sweet :)

  • http://twitter.com/LeoBasic Leo Basic

    I use my Canon 550 for taking photos, especially photos of my work ( pens ). I don’t use camera on phone.And I’m not a pro, but use my hobby( photography ) in my work. And when I compare price of my camera with some tools that I use in work, it’s not cheap, I mean my Canon cost me more then a lathe, which I use for 8 hours a day.

  • http://en-gb.facebook.com/people/Colin-Campbell/760580206 Colin Campbell

    I do most of my shots on a pocket camera that cost me around $40. I find it a cheap and amusing hobby.

  • http://twitter.com/fractals john philpin

    buying a strat does not make you a guitarist – it doesn’t even make you a guitar player – likewise if you are a photographer – the price does not matter …. the kit is definitely cheaper – but if i am buying the services of a photographer for that single once in a life time event – the price of the kit is negligible 

    • http://missdanni.net/ Danni

      I’d have to agree with you. Its about the moment and how you capture it that makes the difference, nothing else really matters.

  • http://www.facebook.com/savioseb Savio Sebastian

    photography’s never been this cheap…

  • Tom Laing

    I have a few friends who earn their living as professional photographers and as with pre digital cameras their equipment is expensive and with the technical innovations and improvements replacement is happening more frequently. My cameras just keep getting smaller and cheaper.

  • Rhonda

    Bang on the money here Paul.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=535235125 Teresa Lynn

    I paid big money for super fantastic photos of my family. It was their talent I paid for. The result was an amazing experience that captured the dynamics of our family lives. I have no idea what camera or kit they have. http://www.dqstudios.com/ will bring you to who we worked with. Talent…and a ridiculous amount of love for what they do makes them true artists.

  • Spettis

    It’s definitely gotten cheaper and easier to take pictures.  The convenience of shooting a picture wherever you are is great. So, even though a phone might not be traditional it makes photography easier.
     

  • delove

    Paul, what’s my best choice for an affordable digital camera to take pictures of the moon and planets?

  • http://www.specialimages.co.uk/blog/ Corporate photographer

    I think we need to remember that a camera is still only a tool. Creating good photography is about being creative. Saying that I do love my new Nikon D3s

  • Pingback: Creative Hobbies

  • Pingback: xanax

  • Pingback: xanax

Scroll to top